In the martial arts, the abundance of Masters and Grandmasters can't be overlooked. Now, I personally do not use for myself or award the title of "Master" to anyone, as I believe there is only one Master, but I still define mastery of the art as this. In my system, an apprentice master (4th Dan) should exemplify the meaning of the shogo title "renshi," being a polished teacher. They have technical mastery of the art, along with the understanding and philosophies that embody the system. By the time they become a full master (5th Dan) is when I expect them to be a Master among Masters. They should have a wide expanse of information and knowledge of not just our system but general information about most of the major arts out there. I want a master in my system to be able to speak intelligently with anyone they'd encounter at a martial arts event, regardless of the other person's background. They're leaders among not just our student base but the community in general. They are perfect representatives of myself and our system.
However, I know everyone defines mastery differently. So how do you define mastery? At what rank are your students eligible to earn master-level titles? We'd love your feedback. Answer in the comments below!
However, I know everyone defines mastery differently. So how do you define mastery? At what rank are your students eligible to earn master-level titles? We'd love your feedback. Answer in the comments below!
